Knowledge, Power and Control :: Philosophy Religion Papers

Information, Power and Control In this paper, I propose to analyze a portion of the issues that emerge because of the connection among information and power, and explicitly those that worry who should control information and spread it in the public eye. This subject is examined in the compositions of Plato and is likewise remarked on by such medieval masterminds as Averroes (Ibn Rushd), Moses Maimonides and St. Thomas Aquinas from the Islamic, Jewish and Christian conventions separately and their perspectives will be quickly sketched out here. In spite of the strict, recorded and social contrasts which recognize their methodologies from each other, what is wonderful is the closeness in the ends that they reach about how noetic force and control is obtained and worked out. They all demand that information ought to be made specifically accessible to specific people and gatherings as per noetic capacity and social situation with regards to the conceived socio-political model of network that is in activity. Informatio n is seen as a saving impact on individual and political life, to be transmitted ideally in a basically unaltered state so as to keep up continue the ideal socio-social worth framework and force structure. The accentuation is on regard for convention and for the inceptions and status of the noetic substance to be transmitted through the skill of those appointed to go about as transmitting operators. The substance of information is as often as possible depicted as secretive and bewildering, just equipped for appropriate understanding by delegated masters. The job of educating is subsequently significant since the educator is the network's selected master for scattering information, as and when suitable, as indicated by the responsive capacities of the individuals who learn. This epistemological methodology seems, by all accounts, to be in sharp complexity to the contemporary perspective on somebody like Paulo Freire who demands that information must be fairly accessible to everybody so as to politically change society change through social justice.(1) This point is accomplished when the noetic procedure turns into a basic perusing of the real world, an appearance in real life which is applied with the goal that customary perspectives establish a perpetual subject for reevaluation. Information is seen in Freirean epistemology as a vehicle of correspondence between individuals, a procedure wherein there is no for all time unaltered noetic information yet rather a continuous rationalization deliberately sought after through logical inconsistency and continually focused on fundamentally reclassifying how individuals can exist together in a condition of social balance. As indicated by this view, information offers everybody the likelihood to ponder the world to follow up on it in an all the more refining way.